5bdb013449f3af956ac85343d2c062f36fbd55d6
152
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 grabowski
|
5bdb013449 |
Optical QC: stacks of 50, aluminium cooling plates cut locally
User, 19 Oct 2026: stack records with spacers; the plates are aluminium and should be cut locally. - Where it sits: 50 records a stack (Cascade), a flat aluminium plate every 10 records to start (MY45; Mobineko uses one per record; the Classic handles plates itself), full discs not ring spacers. - Plates: 5052 (5083 if anodised), 3 mm, diameter and hole to Newbilt's drawing; 28 per 1220 x 2440 sheet, sheet about THB 8,300 ex VAT (OneStockHome, 3003), THB 350 to 450 a plate cut and deburred (estimate); fibre laser or waterjet, Chiang Mai shops listed; deburred, flatness check, kept clean. About 350 plates for a 24 h queue (THB 120k to 160k), 100 to 130 for 8 h. - Spiral cooling tower considered and not taken (full queue USD 75k to 120k for 8 h, dust, no stack weight); a 30 to 60 min spiral stays a later option. - Next steps: Newbilt plate drawing; new plate and settling trial (plate every 5/10/25, warp at 1 h and 24 h). |
||
|
grabowski
|
c939ba1fbb |
Optical QC control: QiTech Control library and shop
User, 19 Oct 2026: check github.com/qitechgmbh/control and shop.qitech.de/collections/ethercat. - QiTech Control (LGPL-3.0, Rust on an EtherCrab fork, NixOS, runs QiTech's own machines): plan now uses its EtherCAT library qitech_lib, pinned, as the layer under our station service; not the full Electron app. It has DC SYNC0, SDO/PDO handling, EK1100/EL2809/EL3021/EL3024 drivers and a CiA402 MINAS A6 servo driver to copy for the A6-EC. Drivers to write: EK1101, EL1809, EL3152, EL5101, A6-EC (upstream). Kernel: start from QiTech's tested settings (6.18, preempt=full, isolcpus 2,3); 6.12 PREEMPT_RT stays the fallback for IgH. - QiTech shop (new Beckhoff stock from an insolvency, ships worldwide): EK1101 EUR 85.13, EL1809 EUR 16.53, EL2809 EUR 41.03, EL9011 EUR 1.76 replace the geizhals offers, EUR 207.57 less. TwinSAFE and Beckhoff STO servo terminals noted, not taken. - EtherCAT parts EUR 1,684 to 1,897 + 2 servo kits (THB 72k to 80k); bench parts about THB 56k; spare coupler/DI/DO now stocked. - BOM total USD 16,671 to 32,681 (THB 0.55M to 1.08M). |
||
|
grabowski
|
face699a28 |
Optical QC: EtherCAT control plan with geizhals.de prices
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 57s
User, 19 Oct 2026: plan the current EtherCAT setup, keep the 100 W servo, check prices on geizhals.de. - New docs/equipment/inline-qc-control-plan.md: decisions, bus layout (drives at the end of the line because the A6-200EC takes control power from the main supply), I/O list for EL1809/EL2809/EL3152/EL5101 and the drive touch probe, PDO and DC notes from the A6-EC manual, geizhals.de price table (EUR 1,891.60 to 2,104.39 + USD 246.58 for the servo kits, THB 80k to 88k), NixOS/EtherCrab software, safety circuit (PNOZ s3, two contactors, dump valve), bench test with pass marks (parts about THB 64k, all reused), build order, spares, open points. - EL3102 replaced by EL3152: the optoNCDT 1420 output is 4 to 20 mA. - Spindle encoder index goes to an EL5101 instead of the drive touch probe; encoder 2,000 to 2,500 pulses. - BOM: control lines split per part with geizhals.de prices (+30% high end for shipping and Thai duty/VAT, estimate); total USD 16,912 to 33,061 (THB 0.56M to 1.09M). Doc, render caption and fleet calculator text now say USD 17k to 33k. - README links the plan. |
||
|
grabowski
|
d26ed7ab3c |
Optical QC: STO servo version looked at, stay with 100 W
User, 18 Oct 2026, asked about the A6-EC400H2B1-M17-STO (400 W, STO, brake, USD 157.91). STO comes only from 400 W; its manual gives no SIL or PL and no certificate, so it cannot replace the contactor; the brake holds nothing on a horizontal axis. Recommendation recorded: keep the 100 W kit; if a rated STO is confirmed in writing, take the brake-less A6-EC400H2A1-M17-STO (USD 129.60) on both axes, 1:2 to 1:3 belt, no contactor. |
||
|
grabowski
|
ba1f5fc3a9 |
Optical QC: EtherCAT control
User, 18 Oct 2026: use an EtherCAT based system. - Spindle and conveyor on the StepperOnline A6-EC100L2A1-M17 kit (100 W, A6-200EC drive, USD 123.29), spindle through a 1:6 belt in cyclic synchronous position, conveyor in cyclic synchronous velocity. - The A6-EC drive has no divided encoder output, so an RS-422 incremental encoder on the spindle shaft clocks both line-scans; its index goes to the drive touch probe for one angle reference. - Station controller: fanless N100 mini PC with 2x Intel i226, NixOS PREEMPT_RT, EtherCAT master EtherCrab (Rust, MIT/Apache) first, IgH (nixpkgs, igc native driver on 6.12 LTS) as fallback; no PLC. - EtherCAT I/O: EK1100, EL1809, EL2809, EL3102 (warp lasers sampled with the spindle position, ~1,000 points a turn at 1 ms). - Safety stays hardwired (safety relay, contactor; no STO at 100 W). - Edge PC with the GPU stays off the real-time loop. - BOM: drives, encoder, controller and I/O lines with sources; total USD 16,112 to 32,938 (THB 0.53M to 1.09M). Next step: EtherCAT bench. - Investor render: cabinet and outfeed labels. |
||
|
grabowski
|
cf900cf3a4 |
Optical QC: spindle servo, 100 W StepperOnline A6-RS kit
User, 18 Oct 2026, asked about the StepperOnline A6-EC100L2A1-M17 (100 W EtherCAT kit). - The motor fits: torque about 0.02 N m needed at the motor through a 1:6 belt (0.32 rated); the belt brings the load inertia (about 25 to 35 kg cm2, estimate; record 20.5) to about 28x the 0.03 kg cm2 rotor. - Take the pulse/RS-485 twin A6-RS100L2A1-M17 (USD 108.78): its drive outputs the encoder as divided A/B/Z pulses for the line-scans and takes pulse/direction from the planned PLC. The EtherCAT drive has no divided output (A6-EC manual, CN1: 5 DI, 3 DO) and needs an EtherCAT master. - inline-optical-qc.md: spindle servo paragraph, sensor table, BOM group; BOM line 109 to 250 (was 300 to 700). Total USD 16,073 to 32,734, THB 0.53M to 1.08M. |
||
|
grabowski
|
9d8a1a1fb8 |
Optical QC: sensor list
User, 18 Oct 2026: list the sensors the optical QC station uses. - inline-optical-qc.md: sensor table in the station setup (4 cameras, 2 warp lasers, spindle encoder, 3 presence sensors and a through-beam, 6 cylinder position switches, door switch; thermal camera option and laser line profiler alternative), with where each sits, what it measures and the price signal. - BOM: cylinder position switches were missing (6, SMC D-M9 class, USD 25 to 60 each, estimate). Total now USD 16,264 to 33,184, still 16k to 33k; THB 0.54M to 1.10M. |
||
|
grabowski
|
8c2143630c |
Optical QC: one station for both presses, after the cooling racks
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 55s
User, 18 Oct 2026: for now one QC station for both machines; let the records cool in a queue before testing them. - inline-optical-qc.md "Where it sits": launch setup. Spindle stacks from the Duplex system and the Classic, labelled at the press (press, stamper set, first and last cycle), cool in FIFO racks (24 h accepted practice, 8 h at the shortest, Stamper Discs; about one day of output, 2,800 to 3,100 records); the finishing operator feeds the station from the cooled stacks. Gains: warp and centring measured on settled records (the release value), one station instead of two, no Classic unloader change, no warm-record sag or thermal camera. Cost: defects found hours later, covered by the Duplex operator, per-cycle telemetry and an early lane for the first records of each run and after stamper changes. Record key from the stack label and stack position, checked against the run-out stamper number. Capacity 10 to 12 a minute against 5 to 6: one station to about two Duplex systems and two Classics. A station at each press stays the later option. Cost table, open points, infeed row, thermal camera note and the Newbilt question follow. - Fleet calculator: the per-press stations and the release station are gone; the finishing block shows the cooling racks with record stacks and the one optical station by the corridor glass; tooltips, corridor and conveyor texts; machine park back to its legend, finishing box "cooling, QC, packing". - quality-automation.md layer 1, digital-factory.md QC row, process-flow.md stage 6, site-candidates.md block ground floor, crane-workshop-tours.md tour stop 6. - Investor render: infeed label "the operator sets each cooled record down". Checks: node --check; pw_bp_calc.py 0 fails; pw_iso_view_check.py OK; info for every data-id at all presets, levels and rotations; GF nodes 2,414 at the full preset; zoomed shots in two rotations. |
||
|
grabowski
|
9ffcfe62f1 |
Plant view: inline optical QC station at every press
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 58s
User, 18 Oct 2026: add the new inline inspection machine to the factory. - Fleet calculator, isometric plant view: qcStation() draws the concept station (1.9 x 0.65 x 1.5 m: aluminium conveyor table with the two rim belts, light-tight tunnel, stack light, record on the infeed, reject bin) in front of the operator in every Duplex cell (after the trimmer) and at the unload side of every Classic, in the hall and in phase 2; own ids qc-duplex-n / qc-classic-n with tooltips from inline-optical-qc.md (Classic hand-off open with Newbilt). Cell floor extended to take the bin. - The finishing block's end-of-line optical station becomes the release inspection: the same station measuring cooled samples (records settle ~24 h); corridor, block and conveyor tooltips reworded. - Machine park schematic: a QC bar in every Duplex cell and Classic, an "inline QC" legend entry; the legend moved to the bottom of the hall box (it collided with the hall heading). - Docs: inline-optical-qc.md (release station location, plant view), site-candidates.md block ground floor, crane-workshop-tours.md tour stop 6. Checks: node --check on all scripts; pw_bp_calc.py 0 fails; pw_iso_view_check.py OK; every data-id has info at all presets, levels and rotations; legend clear of cells and heading up to 30M records; zoomed shots in both themes and two rotations. GF node count at the full preset 2,523 (was 2,388), 8M records ~2,980; rebuild under 60 ms. |
||
|
grabowski
|
705690eb99 |
Fleet calculator: plant view starts from the front, drag pans at any zoom
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 55s
User, 18 Oct 2026: show the factory from the front at start, and make the view movable always, not only after the first zoom. - CNXIso default rotation 1 (from the south-west: office, car park and gate face the viewer) instead of 3; documented setRotation in the header. The business plan renders pin setRotation(1) already. - Drag pans at fit as well (was only when zoomed in); grab cursor at every zoom, grabbing while dragging. On touch screens the fitted view keeps vertical swipes for page scrolling (touch-action pan-y), so a horizontal drag pans; once zoomed in every direction pans, as before. |
||
|
grabowski
|
e8674795f5 |
Inline QC station: real 40x40 profiles, labelled investor render
User, 18 Oct 2026: use real 40x40 profiles, make a render with text pointing out the parts to show the investor; the ring lights looked like they were floating. - build_station.py: frame drawn from the real 8-slot 40 series section (profile_shape: slots, centre bore, corner cavities; 40x80 with centre cavity) and 24 cast angle brackets; top beams now butt between the uprights; label-camera posts moved beside the cameras so both ring lights clamp straight to them; top line-scan on a side post with visible camera plate and light hangers; slide strips on carrier angles, pulley axles, end-stop posts, presence-sensor brackets, backlight post, cabinet on base crosses, chute on two supports and clear of the rail, pneumatics rail, stack light on the back upright, touch screen on the front end upright. A connectivity check at the end lists any part that does not reach the floor through touching parts: none. - render_annotated.py (FreeCAD): front three-quarter view, camera backed off so nothing is clipped, no navigation cube or preselection, label positions projected from the camera and checked with marker renders. - annotate_render.py (Pillow): title, 16 labels in two columns, leaders assigned so none cross -> inline-qc-station-annotated.png. - render_station.py: same camera and preselection fixes; all six views re-rendered. - BOM: 32 m of 40x40 in 45 pieces; total still USD 16k to 33k. - inline-optical-qc.md and README updated; .gitignore for the render intermediates. |
||
|
grabowski
|
609424b598 |
Inline QC station: concept setup on an aluminium profile frame
User, 18 Oct 2026: create a setup for the inline optical QC, an aluminium extrusion frame with all sensors and a conveyor mounted to it. - docs/equipment/inline-qc-station/: FreeCAD script (build_station.py) and model (.FCStd) of one station, 1.9 x 0.65 x 1.5 m on 27 m of 40x40 and 3.8 m of 40x80 profile: rim-belt conveyor (two 6 mm PU round belts under the unrecorded rim, open centre), label gate with top and bottom colour cameras on the fly, inspection position with a lift and rotate chuck (75 mm lift, expanding mandrel, belt-driven servo), top and bottom 4k line-scans on opposite radii with coaxial, dark-field and backlights, two warp lasers, optional thermal camera, light-tight black tunnel with door switch, rodless-cylinder reject pusher with chute and bin, outfeed stop, cabinet, PLC, NixOS edge PC, HMI, stack light. - render_station.py renders six views (open and closed iso, front, plan, inspection detail and elevation via clipped temporary documents). - inline-qc-station-bom.csv: 32 lines with sources; USD 16k to 33k per station without the thermal camera. - inline-optical-qc.md: new section "The station setup" (flow table, inspection zone, cycle ~5 to 6 s, control, BOM by group, open points); cost table updated (two launch stations ~USD 50k to 105k, still inside the metrology launch tier); Duplex/Classic flow now via the conveyor. - README bullet and tree. |
||
|
grabowski
|
5207808b57 |
Inline optical QC: devices for the record inspection station
User, 17 Oct 2026: research on the inline QC equipment, which devices can be used for the optical check. - New docs/equipment/inline-optical-qc.md: defect-by-defect table with the optical signature, device and limit (IEC 98 / DIN 45547 hole and eccentricity, Stamper Discs targets, Mobineko warp limits), precedents (no vinyl product; Dr. Schenk ISM CD scanner as template; Basler/Xiris; PRP AQA 2023; CTU thesis), a station design (centring turntable, 4k line-scan per side with dark-field, bright-field and transmitted light, colour label camera, two laser warp sensors or a line profiler, optional thermal camera) with sourced price signals, resolution and eccentricity math, throughput, placement at the Duplex cell and the Classic, smart-camera vs open GenICam/Aravis/OpenCV/anomalib on NixOS, specials, Thai channels, next steps. - Estimate USD 12k-30k hardware per station, ~USD 40k-100k for the two launch stations; inside the existing metrology launch tier, no plan price change. - Backlinks: quality-automation.md layer 1, digital-factory.md QC integration row, README bullet and tree. |
||
|
grabowski
|
984ced2485 |
Biomass steam in both plans, PV on the factory roof only
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 49s
User, 17 Oct 2026: "only put solar on the factory, prepare the other buildings for solar, option a and b should operate on biomass". - Steam: two 500 kg/h biomass modules (Getabec class, 6M to 10M THB) plus a fuel store and handling block (1M to 2M, estimate) in both plans; the electric bank becomes the alternative. ~0.67M THB of fuel a year against ~4.9M for electric steam; grid demand ~264 kW instead of ~980 kW. - Solar: ~520 kWp on the factory roof (the biomass-case optimum is ~500 to 550 kWp, hourly sketch in sustainability.md "PV size with biomass steam"); office roof and parking canopies built PV-ready (~120 kWp later). ~87 % used on site, ~61 % of the plant's electricity. - Calculator: biomass default, bFuel row, pvKWp 520, pvSelf 87, iso fills the factory roof first and shows the other roofs as PV-ready. - Numbers: launch plant ~168M / 232M / 296M with contingency; Plan A ~182M (~2M above 180M: the Chinese-route lever priced only electric boilers; a Chinese biomass quote is the way back), Plan B ~217M (label ~215M), ~35M more. Calculator EBITDA A 2.17M, B 2.23M USD. - CSV, total-investment, revenue-model, sustainability, scale, biomass, site-candidates, boi, steam-cooling, construction RFQ (canopies PV-ready), README, roadmap; business plan draft 0.3 rebuilt (A and B 63 pages) with new renders. |
||
|
grabowski
|
9ff5feef11 |
Solar on every roof, BOI solar correction, open source section
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 54s
Solar (user, 17 Oct 2026: "use as much roof space as possible") - PV on every roof and canopy: ~640 kWp on the Payap scenario plot (factory roof ~523, canopies ~54, flat office roof ~65 kWp around the AC units); ~300 kWp on the Mueang Chi hall. Calculator: pvKWp 640, new pvSelf 85 % (zero export, hourly sketch), PV cost per kWp times the array, office-roof PV in the iso view, roofs drawn full. - 12.8M to 16.6M THB at 20 to 26 THB/W; CSV baseline 34.37M to 56.34M; launch plant ~168M / 231M / 294M THB with contingency; Plan B ~216M (label ~215M), ~39M above Plan A; Plan A unchanged (it leases the array), its solar lever ~17.5M. PV payback ~4.2 to 5.9 years. - Permits (rooftop solar no factory licence since 28 Dec 2024, ERC exemption under 1,000 kVA, PEA zero export) and PPA discounts sourced in sustainability.md. BOI correction - Announcement 3/2568 (in force 1 July 2025) ended BOI promotion for solar installations; only the battery may qualify (12M THB per MW cap). Removed the "BOI solar measure" from boi.md, total-investment, revenue-model, sustainability, site-candidates and both plan versions; Plan B's case for owning the array is the PPA bill it avoids (~0.07M USD a year). Open source (user, 17 Oct 2026) - digital-factory.md "Open source throughout, and working with other plants": everything we run and build is open source on NixOS, our code published (licence to decide), vendor firmware the stated exception; later the stack and factory-automation services for other pressing plants, not in the revenue. - Business plan section 5.6 plus an executive-summary bullet, reading guide and not-modelled mentions; draft 0.3 rebuilt (A 60, B 61 pages), renders re-made with the roofs full. |
||
|
grabowski
|
ab303618d8 |
Solar and battery re-priced from Thai market data (October 2026)
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 46s
- Rooftop PV, 300 kWp (size still illustrative): 20 to 26 THB/W installed with the Deye hybrid inverters, 6.0M to 7.8M THB (was 25 to 35 THB/W, 7.5M to 10.5M). Sources in the utilities CSV: DEDE Thailand PV Status report (Mahidol survey: 22 to 25 THB/W for factory systems of 10 kW to 1 MW, 2023), CapSolar 2026 (20 to 25 under 1 MWp), Saimai Solar's list (300 kW for 5.4M THB), Deye hybrid inverter retail (160,500 THB per 50 kW). - Battery 271 kWh, now installed: 2.0M to 3.5M THB (was the bare Gobel list price, 1.4M to 2.0M, which matches DEDE's 5,000 to 7,000 THB/kWh for LiFePO4); adds enclosure, fire protection, controls and installation, below CapSolar's 12,000 to 15,000 THB/kWh for a fully installed factory BESS because the hybrid inverters do the conversion (estimate). - Utilities baseline 27.57M to 47.50M THB; launch plant ~160M / 222M / 283M THB with contingency; Plan B ~208M (~149M to 266M), ~31M more than Plan A; Plan A's total unchanged, its solar lever ~9.7M. PV payback ~3.8 to 5.4 years (sustainability.md). Calculator, README, roadmap, revenue model and both business plan versions (renders included) updated. |
||
|
grabowski
|
3f33babdaa |
Plan B re-defined: the launch plant with everything in (~210M THB); front view on the cover
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 52s
- Plan B now starts like Plan A with one Duplex system and one Classic, but takes none of the six levers: owned solar and battery (with the BOI solar measure), the full metrology stack, the visitor corridor, cassette and CD-R, the bought crane and Thai-supplied utilities (user, 17 October 2026). ~193.8M THB before the reserve, ~209M with it (~150M to 268M), ~32M (~18 %) more than Plan A; the second Duplex is a growth step from revenue in both (~15.4M THB, estimate). - total-investment.md "Two plans" re-based (heading and anchor now "B at ~210M THB", README and roadmap links updated); revenue-model.md operating pictures: same volume and EBITDA as Plan A, depreciation on Plan B's capital (operating profit 1.26M USD central, payback ~3.7 yr); the extra earns nothing in the modelled table, which the docs say. - Calculator: Plan B preset = the launch plant with contingency kept out (EBITDA 2.07M USD, cash payback year ~4.3, IRR ~21 %); budget card marks 180M and 180M plus 25 %; preset label "Plan B (~210M, all in)". - Business plan draft 0.3, both versions rebuilt: every Plan B branch of the three content files rewritten; renders regenerated with the isometric view turned to the front of the site (road, car park, office, corridor facade) for the cover and Figures 8 to 10. |
||
|
grabowski
|
ffc6cedbca |
Business plan: isometric calculator views instead of FreeCAD, software section with screenshots
- Cover and section 6.2 now use the isometric plant view of the plant and business plan calculator, drawn with each version's own preset: the cover (roofs, no labels), Figure 8 the site from above, Figure 9 the ground floor cut open, Figure 10 the press hall close up. The FreeCAD aerial render, the Mueang Chi site plan and the hall layout sketch are no longer in the plan; the captions say the calculator draws the Payap scenario model while the 6.2 text and zone table are the Mueang Chi hall. - New section 5.5 "The software: plant overview, factory console and artist platform" with six screenshots of the demos: the plant overview (simulated SCADA), the factory console press floor and its ERPNext link, the artist ordering offer, fan funding and the record passport. Simulated data is marked as such; the platform name stays undecided. - Figures renumbered (budget card 11, cash 12) and named in the section 15 source table. Renders in docs/renders/calculator/ and docs/renders/demos/; README bullet updated. |
||
|
grabowski
|
bd357ab03f |
Business plan draft 0.3 in two versions: Plan A ~180M and Plan B ~225M THB
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 52s
- One build makes both documents: plan_variant.py switches the plan-specific text (pick / is_a / label); build_plan.py writes CNX-Vinyl-Business-Plan-A and -B (docx), export_pdf.py exports both PDFs with the table of contents filled in. Draft 0.2 (single launch-plant plan with contingency) is removed; it stays in the history. - Plan A: the launch plant with every machine and six cost levers, ~177M THB with the ramp-up reserve, no contingency. Plan B: the second Duplex at launch, five presses, ~224M THB on the same basis. Each version reads as a complete plan with one table comparing it with the other; the 216M investor-question text is gone, Pheenix is priced at OMS's reference plus 20 %. - Calculator renders in both documents, each from its own preset: the plant at a glance (Figure 4), the budget check (Figure 5) and ten years of cash (Figure 6), in docs/renders/calculator/. - Calculator budget card: the verdict and third KPI now name the tightest budget the midpoint fits (Plan A: 3.3M to spare under 180M; Plan B: 0.8M under 225M) instead of always 225M. - Fixes: CD replication cross-references point to section 4.10; the blended price in section 3.3 and roadmap item 1 is 3.76 to 5.27 USD at 60 % specials (3.50 to 4.60 at a standard-heavy mix). |
||
|
grabowski
|
f2ff1eac1f |
Two plans for the investor: Plan A ~180M, Plan B ~225M THB; Pheenix at OMS +20 %
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 53s
User (October 2026): price the Pheenix galvanics line at OMS's reference plus 20 %, and work on a new business plan in two versions, one at roughly 180M THB and one at +25 %; the plans do not include contingency; Plan A keeps every machine and uses cost levers only. - total-investment.md: Pheenix block 324k to 445k USD (OMS 4-cell wet room with know-how transfer, EUR 234k to 321k, plus 20 %; was 320k to 650k estimate); launch plant now ~161M to 285M THB with contingency, midpoint ~223M. New section "Two plans": Plan A = launch plant with solar PPA, metrology launch tier, corridor later, cassette and CD-R later, rented crane, Chinese boilers and compressor: subtotal ~161.7M + ramp-up reserve 10 to 20M = ~177M THB (127M to 226M). Plan B = second Duplex at launch (five presses), everything in: subtotal ~209.2M + reserve = ~224M THB (162M to 286M). Contingency listed as not in either price (~24M / ~31M at 15 %). The 180M / 216M answer marked superseded. - revenue-model.md: operating pictures of both plans at 60 % specials. Plan A central EBITDA 1.73M USD, operating profit 1.34M, payback ~3.1 yr on the plan price; adverse loses money. Plan B (1.0 / 1.25 / 1.5M records) central EBITDA 3.14M, operating profit 2.63M, payback ~2.2 yr; adverse just covers depreciation; needs ~1.25M records sold. - Calculator: Pheenix price basis "OMS +20 %" and "OMS directly"; new contingency switch (in the total / shown separately); presets Plan A and Plan B (replace "investor levers" and "five-press"); budget card against 180M and 225M. - galvanics.md price note, README, roadmap. Checks: calculator regression updated and passing (0 fails, no page errors), node --check on all scripts, site build (no dead links), no em dashes added. |
||
|
grabowski
|
f7e20e1015 |
Make a record: USD / THB / EUR selector and English / Thai language switch
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 1m45s
User (October 2026): currency selector on the first page (USD / THB /
EUR) and a language selector for Thai on the make-a-record demo.
- Top bar: one currency control (replaces the THB/USD switch on the
price step) and an EN / Thai control, visible from step 1; both persist
(localStorage, #cur= / #lang= in the URL, hash wins). Prices stay
computed in THB: USD = THB / 33, EUR = THB / 38.115 (1 EUR = 1.155
USD); the fan price is entered in the chosen currency and stored in
THB, the campaign rule max(100, break-even) unchanged.
- Thai: every visible string, tooltip, aria label, file check, quote
line, production update, passport, investor note and tour caption
(dictionary T = {en, th}, t(key, vars), data-i18n attributes; 636
keys), system Thai fonts, Thai dates with Gregorian years, and a footer
note that the Thai is a draft translation for review. Template PDFs
stay English (Helvetica has no Thai glyphs).
- Top bar wraps to two rows below 1000 px (steps were cut off between 761
and 990 px before).
- README and landing entries mention the currencies and Thai.
Checks (headless Edge): doc example unchanged in THB (37,836 per title,
232 per copy at 100, break-even 41, goal 100, ~548 kept, 640 hint);
conversions exact; 390 / 768 / 1024 / 1440 px, light and dark, EN and
TH, all currencies, steps 1 to 5: no page errors, overflow or untranslated
leftovers; tour in Thai; node --check; no em dashes.
|
||
|
grabowski
|
3f1e4452b8 |
Press hall: five Duplex bays and four Classic positions (balanced at 60 % specials)
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 44s
User (October 2026): "change the hall layout" after the finding that the 60/40 floor split leaves the Classics about half loaded at 60 %+ specials (specials run only on the Duplex systems). - Press hall now keeps five Duplex bays (four along the visitor corridor, the fifth at the head of the second row) and four Classic positions: 550 + 200 = ~750 m2 of ~870 m2, ~73/27 by floor, 10 to 4 by presses; launch plant fills one of each, growth adds Duplex first. - Full hall: ~2.9 to 4.4M records a year at 60 % specials, Classics ~80 to 100 % loaded (60/40 gave ~2.3 to 3.6M); ~3.2 to 4.4M at ~20 %; fourteen presses as before: ~2.1 to 2.5 t/h steam, up to ~1.8 MW cooling, a utility phase of its own. - pressing-line.md, scale.md, site-candidates.md, crane-workshop-tours.md, roadmap.md, README (FreeCAD model still the earlier layout, not redrawn); calculator preset "Full hall (5 D + 4 C)" and ladder; plant view reserves 5 Duplex bays and 4 Classic positions; business plan draft 0.2 rebuilt. Checks: renderer 720 checks and functional checks pass, calculator regression 0 fails, level checks clean; PDF 47 pages, TOC filled. |
||
|
grabowski
|
b3e8e4272b |
Specials share 60 %+: revenue model, calculator and business plan re-based
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 52s
User (October 2026): "lets say 60+% special prints" (the plant focuses on special prints, not mono colours). - Specials (splatter, marble, colour effects) run only on the Duplex systems, so at 60 % the Duplex sets the launch plant's output: ~0.58 / 0.74 / 0.90M records a year (was 0.71 / 0.84 / 0.97 at ~20 %), the Classic at about two thirds load. Full 60/40 hall: ~2.3 to 3.6M (Duplex -limited, Classics about half loaded); five-press fleet unchanged. A hall balanced by output at 60 % would give Duplex ~70 to 75 % of the floor (estimate; noted, not applied). - Blended price 3.76 / 4.49 / 5.27 USD (standard 3.40 / 3.80 / 4.25 plus the 0.60 / 1.15 / 1.70 specials premium on 60 %). Launch operating picture: revenue 2.28 / 3.65 / 5.41M USD, EBITDA 0.23 / 1.73 / 3.79M, operating profit -0.66 / 1.21 / 3.46M, payback ~3.8 yr central, break-even ~0.25M records; adverse needs ~1.1M records to cover depreciation. Specials' extra direct cost (coloured compound, purge, trim only into black) is not in the cost table yet: flagged as an upper bound until compound quotes. - Calculator default specials share 20 -> 60 % (planning rates keep the launch plant balanced at 850k: revenue 4.14M, EBITDA 2.07M, payback 3.3 yr, cash payback year ~4.8, IRR ~18 %). - revenue-model.md, scale.md, pressing-line.md, README; business plan draft 0.2 rebuilt (sections 1, 4, 9, risks). Checks: calculator regression 0 fails, no page errors, node --check on all scripts; PDF 47 pages, table of contents filled; no em dashes added. |
||
|
grabowski
|
d8b2c1e2db |
Press hall laid out 60/40 for Duplex systems (special pressings first)
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 46s
User (October 2026): "the factory should have more space for duplex setups than classic, we will mainly focus on special prints and not mono colours plan it to be 60/40 duplex classic". - Press hall (~870 m2) planned 60/40 by floor: four Duplex bays along the visitor corridor and six Classic positions in the second row (440 + 300 = ~740 m2 at 110 / 50 m2), the rest open for mould carts and staging; the launch plant fills one of each, growth adds Duplex systems first. Replaces "room for ten more Classics". - Full hall: 8 semi-automatic presses + 6 Classics, 57/43 by press count, ~1,250 to 1,410 records/h gross, ~3.6 to 4.7M a year on the scale.md basis (was 4.7 to 5.8M for 2 Duplex + 11 Classics); ~2.1 to 2.5 t/h steam and up to ~1.8 MW cooling, still a utility phase of its own. By hourly output the six automatic Classics still press more than the eight semi-automatic presses (estimate). - pressing-line.md, scale.md (capacity table, utilities), site-candidates .md, crane-workshop-tours.md, roadmap.md, README (the FreeCAD Payap model still draws the earlier layout; noted, not redrawn). - Calculator: preset "Full hall 60/40 (4 D + 6 C)", fleet ladder Duplex first (1+1, 2+1, 3+2, 4+3, 4+6) plus the same floor Classic-led (2+11) and Duplex-only (7+0) for comparison; plant view reserves 4 Duplex bays and 6 Classic positions. - Business plan draft 0.2 rebuilt (capacity table row, plot fit, layout). Checks: renderer 720 checks pass (node budget 2,700 for the Duplex-heavy stress preset, 60 fps), calculator regression 0 fails, level selector and page checks clean at 390 / 1024 / 1440 px dark and light; PDF 47 pages with a filled table of contents. |
||
|
grabowski
|
4beda7f27a |
Plant view: toilets in the factory, link lands on doors, no separate trimmer
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 45s
User feedback on the isometric view (October 2026): - "the production hall is missing toilets": two sets. At the staff entry: women 2 WC, men 1 WC and 1 urinal, an accessible WC, basins. At the east end of the back aisle in the finishing block: women 2 WC, men 1 WC and 1 urinal, basins (proposed, not yet in the parametric plans). site-candidates.md gets a Toilets bullet with the Thai minimum (Ministerial Regulation No. 39 B.E. 2537, table 2; separate toilets for men, women and disabled staff under the welfare regulation B.E. 2548). - "the door and the corridor is not aligned": the covered link now lands on doors at both ends, centred on it (factory entrance at the start of the visitor corridor, office lobby door on the north face, windows cleared); the corridor glass starts after the door; the stray staff door with no path is gone; the link deck ramps up to the factory floor. - "we also dont need a extra trimmer with the optical, this is included in the duplex and the classics": the finishing block keeps only the optical inspection station; site-candidates.md, the tour route and the process flow say the presses trim inline. Checks: renderer 720 checks and functional checks pass (max 2,485 SVG nodes); calculator regression 0 fails; level selector works in the page; no page errors or overflow at 390 / 1024 / 1440 px, dark and light. |
||
|
grabowski
|
8e4559ee36 |
Plant view: GF / 1F / Roof levels, lamps off the drive areas, pipe bridges land on walls
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 48s
User feedback on the isometric view (October 2026):
- "a light pole in the middle of the truck apron": a PAVED list of the
drive areas (gate road, aprons, east road, lane, access road, car
park, yard); every lamp now stands on a kerb or verge (the apron lamp
to the south kerb, three more moved off drive areas, one added on the
east road); one LAMPS list feeds poles and light pools.
- "the office building also has 2 levels, can we make a selector for GF
1 2": the Roof / Inside toggle becomes GF | 1F | Roof. 1F shows the
office first floor (+4.0 m: offices, meeting and training, meeting
room, IT and server, toilets, pantry, flexible room, stair and lift)
and the finishing and print block's upper floor (+3.8 m: print room in
reserve, print stock, packaging materials, stair and goods lift), the
rest ghosted. Office ground floor re-split after the floor plans
(site-candidates.md). setMode('inside'/'roof') still works; new
setLevel / getLevel / onLevel; the level survives calculator updates.
- "the pipe bridge to the pump and HX room also stops mid air": both
pipe bridges now drop down the wall faces at the factory and at the
yard building to low-level wall sleeves, with a second support post.
Checks: renderer 720 checks (presets x GF/1F/Roof x 390/1024/1440 x
dark/light) and functional checks pass; calculator regression 0 fails;
level selector works in the page; screenshots reviewed in all rotations.
|
||
|
grabowski
|
073f20a132 |
Plant view: cars under the canopies, PV on the car park, yard lamps, silo order
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 47s
User feedback on the isometric view (October 2026): - "the cars are above the car park roof": cars and scooters were their own sprites and the depth sort put some above the canopy; they are now drawn inside the canopy sprite before the posts and the roof, so the roof always covers them in every rotation. - "a light pole in the middle of the yard": the two yard lamps at the service-lane edge (one in front of the boiler hall) move to the yard's back fence; one LAMPS list feeds both the poles and the light pools. - "add solar panels to the car park": the car and scooter canopies now take PV first (107 modules, ~48 kWp; construction RFQ has canopy PV), the factory roof the rest (560 of 667 modules at 300 kWp); canopy tooltips give their kWp. - "arrange the pvc storage outside to be black, red, yellow": the silos read black, black, red, yellow from the default north-east view. Renderer checks rerun (288 + functional, no failures); calculator regression 62 checks pass; 390 / 1024 / 1440 px, dark and light, no page errors or overflow. |
||
|
grabowski
|
d7380919e4 |
Steam and cooling, plant operation: show the launch plant (1 Duplex + 1 Classic)
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 43s
User (October 2026): "launch plant should be 1x duplex system and 1x classic". The calculator already did; these two pages did not. - steam-cooling.html: default case is now "Launch plant" (D1-A, D1-B, Classic; B-1 and B-2; CH-1 and CH-2: 450 to 540 kg/h on 1,000 kg/h, 391.5 kW on 500 kW). Other cases: Duplex first (commissioning), Second Duplex (growth option, five presses), One module down (launch plant with B-2 and CH-2 out). Idle boxes say "reserved position" / "growth option". Phasing table: launch plant, second Duplex, options; galvanics cooling is launch scope. Five-press figures labelled as the growth case or backbone sizing; chiller cost per the CSV 2-module row. - plant-operation.html: the launch plant: Classic C2 removed everywhere (press, trimmer, routes, conveyor, lamps, texts), Classic re-centred; one PDPU (2 cells) as in total-investment; boilers 2 x 500 kg/h, chillers 2 x 250 kW; title arrivals scaled to three presses; phone legend in one column. - Landing entries and README bullets for both pages. Verified headless (Edge): skill checks pw_sc_check and pw_plant_check with launch-plant expectations, 90-day runs, perf unchanged; 390 / 1024 / 1440 px dark and light without page errors or overflow. |
||
|
grabowski
|
71e30b0633 |
Plant view: isometric tile-game render of the configured plant
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 45s
User request (October 2026): a SimCity / Factorio style render in the calculator for an overview of the factory, solar and utilities. New card "The plant at a glance" at the top of the plant and business plan calculator: an isometric SVG scene (CNXIso, inlined with its iso- prefixed CSS) of the Payap-scenario site driven by the calculator state: Duplex systems and Classics (r.D, r.C; overflow into the phase 2 building), galvanics in-house or "stampers bought in", cutting in-house or "cut abroad", metrology tier, cassette and CD-R benches, solar buy / PPA / none (300 kWp, 271 kWh battery), electric or biomass steam (fuel store, chip pile, smoking stack), boiler and chiller modules out of the four positions each (r.nb, r.nc), crane, visitor corridor. Roof / Inside cutaway, four rotations with a north arrow, zoom, pan, pinch, tap for figures from the docs; dusk in the dark theme, day in the light theme; CSS-only animation that pauses off-screen and respects reduced motion. The scene only rebuilds when its config changes. Verified headless on Edge: 390 / 1024 / 1440 px, dark and light, no page errors, no overflow, presets map to the scene (lean, five-press, full hall); the calculator's 62-check regression still passes; node --check on all scripts. Renderer built and tested separately (288 checks). |
||
|
grabowski
|
485b3b630a |
Plant and business plan calculator: configuration, investment, budget, ten-year cash
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 44s
User request (October 2026): an interactive business plan calculator where the plant configuration is chosen and everything follows. Built into the fleet calculator (same page and URL, one model): - Plant configuration card: galvanics in-house or bought stampers (and Pheenix estimate vs OMS reference), mastering and cutting in-house or outsourced, metrology full or launch tier, cassette and CD-R, solar buy / PPA / none, electric or biomass steam, Thai or Chinese utilities, crane buy or rent, visitor corridor now or later, ramp-up reserve; stamper supply to other plants; disabled-not-hidden controls. - Investment built from the total-investment blocks (low / mid / high, sources and kind badges); boiler and chiller modules sized from the fleet and flagged past the four positions; phase 2 building past the 870 m2 press hall. Default reproduces 160.9 / 226.7 / 292.5M THB. - Budget card against 180M and 216M THB; "Investor levers" preset gives 193.6M mid, 203.6 to 213.6M with the reserve. - Money follows the configuration: outsourced title steps passed through at cost (fee split 51.1 / 37.0 / 11.9 %), electric steam energy and demand charge, PPA power price, optional cassette/CD-R revenue. - Ten-year cash view: editable ramp and discount rate, payback, NPV, IRR, chart and table; pre-tax, pre-financing sketch. - Presets: launch plant, investor levers, lean, five-press, full hall. - Verified headless on Edge: 62 checks, 390 / 1024 / 1440 px, dark and light, no overflow, no page errors. Business plan 9.4 cross-check updated to the calculator's figures (EBITDA 1.68M, payback 4.1 yr; cash payback year ~5.7, IRR ~13 %); docx and pdf rebuilt. README and landing entry renamed. |
||
|
grabowski
|
d42e99389b |
Business plan draft 0.2: re-based on the launch plant
The investor business plan (docx + pdf) rebuilt for the launch plant decided in October 2026: one Duplex system and one Classic, Pheenix galvanics with zero discharge, the Sibert line, a Sillitoe cutting room, modular steam and cooling (rooms for four), cassette and CD-R; no bridge stampers, no outsourced cutting; second Duplex as a growth option. - Part A: executive summary (what changed since 0.1, the numbers, the 180M / 216M answer, first release marked open), reading guide, two price points (ResurRec and Record Industry), anatomy rewritten for Sillitoe, Pheenix, Sibert, Duplex + Classic, lead times without bridge stampers, new 4.8 artist platform, cassette 4.9, CD 4.10. - Part B: traceability with ERPNext as system of record, metrology launch tier as the investor's choice, QC, efficiency (PEA tariff, utility modules, fuel open, Chinese boilers and DIW rules), site (Mueang Chi, Payap zoning result), building blocks, safety, BOI and licences with galvanics in the first factory licence. - Part C: launch-plant investment table, the investor's question and levers, tranches, currency, operating picture of the launch plant, timeline with the metal path on the critical path, commissioning sequence and why the whole chain at launch, team, 22 risks, 17 phase 0 actions, the ask. - plan_lib: grid column widths so LibreOffice keeps table widths. - export_pdf.py: LibreOffice UNO export that fills the table of contents (47 pages). - README: total investment, revenue model and business plan bullets. |
||
|
grabowski
|
794cde228c |
Re-base scale, pressing line, roadmap, revenue model and calculator on the launch plant
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 48s
Launch plant (user, October 2026): one Duplex system and one Classic, with cutting and galvanics in-house, everything in one capital round. - scale.md: capacity table now launch plant 0.71-0.97M records/yr, the second Duplex as a growth option; launch utilities (450-540 kg/h on B-1/B-2, ~390 kW on 2 x 250 kW); calculator figure ~0.94M. - pressing-line.md: launch plant section on top; five-press fleet kept as the layout fleet the hall and backbone are built for. - roadmap.md: long-lead orders for the launch plant, no bridge stampers or outsourced cutting, commissioning order, what stays revenue-gated. - revenue-model.md: operating picture of the launch plant: central revenue ~3.75M USD, EBITDA ~1.6M, operating profit ~1.1M, payback ~4 yr on 216M THB, break-even ~0.3M records; adverse corner cannot cover depreciation. Five-press table kept and labelled. - fleet-calculator.html: start fleet 1 Duplex + 1 Classic, target 850k, capex base 6.55M (cases 8.9 / 6.55 / 4.9M), Duplex beyond one, chiller 500 kW, imported machinery 2.3M, ladder from the launch plant. - total-investment.md: superseded note updated. |
||
|
grabowski
|
7344f12dc8 |
Chinese suppliers for boilers, compressed air and hydraulics
Checked October 2026 on the investor's budget question. New docs/suppliers/china-utilities.md: boiler makers (ZOZEN, Sitong, Fangkuai, Taiguo, Yuanda, Yongxing, Taishan, Nobeth) with fit for 500 kg/h at 1.25 MPa, claimed certificates, Thai references and listing prices; the Thai rules for an imported boiler (MR and MOI notification B.E. 2549: ASME/JIS/EN or equivalent, certification-body verification, once-through relief does not reach 10.5 bar, licensed controller, annual inspection); compressor makers with Thai offices (Kaishan, Denair) and sizing; hydraulic pump sets and accumulators (Huade, Yuci, Hengli, WMD, Renowell, Inovance, NXQ makers), the shared-ring-main risks and Thai HPU builders; duty and freight; open RFQs. Result: about 2M THB at the midpoint (~2.5M with contingency), ~1 % of the 216M target, mostly the boilers; Newbilt aggregates stay Newbilt's. total-investment notes it and lists the uncosted central hydraulic plant; utilities CSV gets the Chinese candidates and route estimates; backlinks from equipment-suppliers, pressing-line, README. |
||
|
grabowski
|
553b4a93d1 |
Launch plant roll-up and the investor's 180M THB question
Decided (user, October 2026): the plant launches with everything in one capital round, commissioned in sequence: one Newbilt Duplex system, one Classic, a Pheenix galvanics line with ZLD water, the Sibert line, a Sillitoe cutting room, and the modular steam and cooling plant (2 x 500 kg/h boilers, 2 x 250 kW chillers, rooms for four each). No bridge stampers, no outsourced cutting; cassette and CD-R stay; the second Duplex and further Classics are growth options, not in the investment. total-investment.md: new 'Launch plant' roll-up, 4.9M to 8.9M USD, 161M to 292M THB incl. 15 % contingency (midpoint ~227M), with what is left out (ramp-up reserve ~10-20M THB, CD replication, financing, FX, archive shelving) and the BOI assumption. The investor's question (180M THB, maybe +20 % = 216M): fits at the low end only; at the midpoint four levers that keep every machine (solar via PPA, metrology launch tier, galvanics near OMS's reference, visitor corridor later) give ~193M, plus reserve ~203-213M, inside 216M; 180M needs low quotes. The quotes that decide it: Newbilt (Duplex, Classic), Pheenix galvanics, building with soil test, metrology. Old full vision and phased entry marked superseded until the mirrors are re-based. Utilities CSV: chiller bank two modules (4.9-7.9M THB), boiler note for B-1 and B-2 at launch, ZLD and DI rows now launch scope (carried with galvanics); baseline 28.47M-48.73M THB. README project status. |
||
|
grabowski
|
07ef9c0b9a |
Order demos: spine choice, artwork templates, PDF and AI uploads
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 50s
User request (October 2026): the order tool needs a thin / thick spine selection, templates for the jacket and label upload, and must accept AI and PDF files. Both artist demos (artist-order, make-a-record): - Spine: thin 3 mm (one record) or thick 5 mm (two records, or a thick insert); a double album in a single jacket takes 5 mm, thin is then disabled; 7", gatefold (7 or 9 mm) and own jacket disable the row with the reason. Quote line 'Thick 5 mm spine' (R.spine 12 / 10 THB per copy, estimate from QRP 0.90 vs 0.55 USD and Kudos 137.50 GBP/order). Mock-up draws the spine edge to scale; caption names it. - Templates: vector PDFs written in the browser for the current choice: jacket spread (back, spine, front; 633/635 x 315 mm for 12" from Mighty Media Discs), gatefold with an inside page, labels with a page per side and the dinked hole; trim and bleed boxes set, 3 mm bleed, 5 mm safe area, folds, crop marks, guidance notes. - Uploads accept PDF, AI (PDF-compatible) and images. PDFs are read in the browser (object streams inflated with DecompressionStream): page boxes, pages, PDF/X, creator, colour spaces, font embedding; checks against the chosen spine (a 5 mm spread on a 3 mm order is flagged), bleed, CMYK, fonts; old PostScript-only AI files are refused with the fix. Image spreads are measured the same way. Preview via pdf.js (jsDelivr, loaded only when a PDF arrives); the front panel goes into the mock-up. artist-platform.md: new section 'Artwork templates and files' with the sources; preflight step links it; RI 'left out' list updated. README demo bullet. Checked headless on Edge: fixtures (3/5 mm spreads, no bleed, AI, legacy AI, front only, labels, 150 dpi PNG), downloaded templates parsed with PyMuPDF, 390/1024/1280 px no overflow, dark and light, no page errors; pw_mr_check --tour and pw_ri unchanged (37,836 / 232). |
||
|
grabowski
|
5c303dfc61 |
ERPNext is the only system of record; we build tools on it
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 46s
User (October 2026): we only build tools and interfaces that interact with ERPNext; invoices, stock and the rest are kept there, except telemetry and other machine data. digital-factory.md: standing decision, decisions 2, 3, 6, 7 and 10 rewritten (ERPNext holds every record of the business and of production, including artist gates, metal-part genealogy as serial numbers with parents, and quality inspections; the machine-data store keeps only cycle and record rows, the hash chain and time series, keyed to ERPNext names; ERPNext first, then custom fields or document types in cnx_erp, then a tool, never a second business database). Systems table, architecture labels, factory application section (modules as a table: records in ERPNext, what we build, machine data outside; our only tables are the machine-data ones), ownership table, integration rules 4 and 8, phasing and estimates (cnx_erp app 2 to 3 person-months; total 3.5 to 6). artist-platform.md: campaigns are an ERPNext document from launch, pledges post as advance payment entries; traceability, README, facility security (archive location on the serial number), production timeline (sets per mother on the mother's serial number), crane-workshop spares store, total-investment. Factory console: KPI row no longer touches the postings card (user screenshot); ERPNext page, order card, sidenote and ledger say every record lives in ERPNext and only machine data stays outside; new postings for artist gates, stamper metrology inspections, stamper set serial numbers (grown, retired with play count). Checked headless: Edge dark and light, 1440/1024/390, no overflow or page errors, rows aligned, pw_fc, pw_wo, pw_feed and pw_erp pass. |
||
|
grabowski
|
a101c9f7db |
Factory console: ERPNext link page and ERPNext documents on orders
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 45s
Follows the decision that the whole plant runs ERPNext and every tool
we build interacts with it (
|
||
|
grabowski
|
e12ad2ed7b |
ERPNext runs the whole plant; every tool we build integrates with it
Decided by the user (October 2026): the whole plant runs ERPNext, and all tooling we develop has to interact with it. digital-factory.md: standing decision in the summary; decision 10 (ERPNext owns the business documents, the factory application owns the floor; ERPNext names are the shared keys); new section 'ERPNext: the plant's ERP' with the ownership table (customers, prices, sales orders, items and BOMs, work orders and job cards per station, batches and quality inspections per compound lot, serial numbers for metal parts, downtime entries, delivery notes, assets, accounting, payroll vs. cycles, per-record inspection, genealogy and the hash-chained log staying in the factory application), the integration rules (one typed Frappe REST client in cnx-factory, an integration user per tool, webhooks in, transactional outbox with idempotent postings so the floor never waits on the ERP, business-sized postings, customisation as a Frappe app in Gitea, nightly reconciliation, no public ERPNext endpoint, new tools use the same client), hosting on NixOS (no nixpkgs module, NixOS/nixpkgs #241921; Avunu frappe-nix as the start, frappe_docker as oci-containers fallback; MariaDB + Redis; vinyl-erp on site behind the gateway proxy; OIDC sign-on; upgrades on a restored copy), Thai localisation (Ecosoft erpnext_thailand: VAT, WHT, PND, billing notes; Ecosoft as partner to quote; payroll and BOI reporting to check), phasing (dev ERPNext now; accounting and assets from the first capex invoice; manufacturing at commissioning) and estimates. ERPNext added to the architecture diagram, services, machines (vinyl-erp), module list, backup, cost, build order and open decisions; the old 'ERP out of scope, decide after launch' line replaced. artist-platform.md: price list, customers, sales orders, campaign pledges as payment entries, through the plant's outbox. traceability.md: one ERP, one set of keys. README summary. total-investment.md added scope: ERPNext (to quote, not in the sum, no licence fee). |
||
|
grabowski
|
655d5705c4 |
Supplier: LPI Rack Range (Thailand), racking and mobile shelving
Added at the user's request (October 2026): LPI Rack Range (Thailand) Corp., Ltd., Bangkok head office, plants in Bangplee Industrial Estate and Bangpla (Samut Prakan); office mobile shelving for documents, pallet racking (selective, drive-in, mobile, shuttle, pallet flow), picking shelves and mezzanines, mould-and-die racking, mini-load AS/RS; no specs or prices published (lpi.co.th, checked October 2026). equipment-suppliers.md section 8 entry; the Thai supplier the archive shelving is quoted against (facility-security.md open points, supplier map archive line); racking candidate in the utilities CSV. |
||
|
grabowski
|
4f02d9a7a9 |
Archive room: mobile shelving for the father and mother archive
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 43s
Planned (October 2026, user): the archive in the office gets mobile archive shelving, A-Z Solutions (Vienna) as the reference (a-z-solutions.eu, checked October 2026: hand wheel or electric drive, lockable, rails need early floor planning; no published prices). facility-security.md, new section under Protecting the irreplaceable: what it holds (fathers and mothers, ~1,200 to 2,400 parts a year; a reference pressing per title only as a proposal), sizing estimates (about 0.2 kg per part, ~3 mm and ~75 kg per shelf metre; in the Payap office's ~4 x 5.75 m room two fixed runs, four double carriages and one aisle hold ~150 shelf metres, ~50,000 parts, 20+ years), what it asks of the building (ground slab at full rating, ~11 kN/m2 under the block; rails in the screed fixed before the floor finish; geared hand wheel; gas, climate, leak sensor, access control; barcoded box addresses), open points (quotes from A-Z and a Thai supplier, storage format from the galvanics vendors, fathers in a second compartment or off site). Mirrors: site-candidates.md (office ground floor), phase 1 RFQ (archive keeps the full slab rating if the slab is zoned), digital-factory.md (archive location as box and shelf position, sets per mother), equipment-suppliers.md (section 8 entry), total-investment.md added scope (to quote, not in the sum). |
||
|
grabowski
|
475623e9f2 |
Archive the father as well as the mother; how many represses a mother carries
Decided (October 2026): the plant keeps the father and the mother of every side. production-timeline.md (repress section) records the decision and the rule of thumb with sources: about 10 stamper sets per mother before it degrades (Third Man Pressing FAQ, a Nashville plater via WPLN), fewer in quality-minded sources (5 VinyLab, 6 to 8 Stereo Review 1962); a father grows about 5 to 10 mothers. So a mother covers roughly ten represses (10,000 to 20,000 records a side) and a worn one is replaced from the archived father without a new cut. galvanics.md: 4 archived parts per title, ~1,200 to 2,400 a year; new open question to all galvanics candidates (sets per mother, mothers per father, storage). artist-platform.md repress paragraph. Demos: make-a-record and artist-order say father and mother are archived; factory console archives the father on represses too, counts stamper sets per mother (shown in the genealogy and the customer's metal card), and the metal archive counts fathers and mothers. |
||
|
grabowski
|
1cceedc8a4 |
Factory console: inspection feeds in fixed columns
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 45s
The live inspection feeds (floor, quality, press, customer's latest copies) were one run-on string, so a shorter press ID (C1 vs D1-A) shifted everything after it and the cycle time showed twice. Each row is now a grid of fixed columns sized in characters of the mono font: time, stamper, press, order, result, with a header row (the row keeps the mono font so its columns match; only the labels change font). On phones the order column (factory) or press column (customer) drops. The full record key stays in the stamper cell's tooltip. Work order cards: station chip left, work order ID right-aligned in the header, the assignee moves to the time line, so card headers no longer shift with the ID length. |
||
|
grabowski
|
f9b8407561 |
Factory console: work orders for the operators
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 51s
New "Work orders" section in the factory console (#work), derived from the same simulated records as the rest of the page, one work order per station and job: - order stages: mastering, lacquer cutting, electroforming, stamper prep, test pressings, press run, packing, dispatch - stamper changes (planned when a set nears its life, in progress during the change), fault clearing on a stopped press (maintenance) - material lab: lab gate per compound lot, release test pressing, and the held lot's re-dry and retest (button starts it) - audio QC: each sampled copy's listening check Board: In progress (press floor first) / Next up (planned press runs and stamper changes with time and press, jobs arriving at the next station) / Done today, filter per station, KPIs. Each work order opens a kiosk view: the steps an operator follows (badge in, scan what the step asks for, with the IDs to scan, confirm), confirmation times and who did it, the order, lot or press it belongs to, and what it writes to the log. Order detail lists the order's work orders by station. Mastering and cutting are booked to the engineers, the lab, QC and maintenance to technicians, the rest to numbered operators; jobs finishing at night are booked to the late shift. README, digital-factory.md demo paragraph and the landing page mention the work orders. |
||
|
grabowski
|
dd7b749af9 |
Factory console: demo fleet of one Duplex system and one Classic
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 51s
Three presses for now (D1-A, D1-B on one Newbilt Duplex system, C1 Classic) instead of the plan's two Duplex systems. Order arrivals scaled to the smaller fleet (about 3,000 to 4,600 good records a day); press row fills the width; landing page text updated. |
||
|
grabowski
|
9ed51f4b22 |
Factory console and customer order status: investor demo
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 51s
New page docs/factory-console.html (site /demos/factory/): the factory application of digital-factory.md on a simulated plant day, with a switch to the customer portal of the same orders. Factory console (sidebar: Floor, Orders, Quality, Lab, Metal, Ledger): - floor: five presses of the launch fleet (two Newbilt Duplex systems, one Classic) with the mounted order, live good / rejected counters, stamper plays against life, cycle time and steam; KPIs for the day; live optical inspection stream with record keys; alerts (stops, lab holds, stampers near end of life, listening reviews, long gate waits); stations (cutting, galvanics, stamper prep, lab, packing); orders by stage; good records per day - orders list with stage filters and search; order detail with stage track, approvals, metal genealogy and stamper metrology, press run telemetry, compound lot certificate, rejects by reason, audio samples, packing and shipping, and the order's events - press detail with telemetry sparklines; quality (rejects by reason, yield per press, audio comparison); lab (compound lots with results against illustrative limits, one lot on hold with re-dry and retest, regrind batches, hoppers); metal (baths, mounted stampers, metrology, archive); hash-chained event log Customer portal (four demo customers: pressing now, waiting to approve the test pressing, in plating, delivered): progress through every step and the three gates, copies pressed so far with the latest copies and their record keys, approving the test pressing books the press slot (greedy plan of the queue gives the start time and press), and a quality report that fills in step by step: files, lacquers, metal parts with metrology, test pressings, the compound lot's lab results, pressing and inspection, listening checks, packing. Simulation: 60 days warmed up at load (about 0.7 s), then 1x to 3600x. Stages and durations from the production timeline, Newbilt cycle times, two shifts 06:00 to 22:00, unplanned stops, stamper life 1,000 to 2,000 plays, audio sampling first-off plus about 1 in 50 (1 in 25 near end of life), compound lots through the lab gate and release test pressing. All orders, values and IDs are simulated; limits are illustrative. Linked from digital-factory.md (the factory application), traceability.md (customer-facing view), the README and the landing page. |
||
|
grabowski
|
5090609df3 |
Calculators: options from Record Industry's calculator; its prices as a benchmark
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 45s
Reviewed Record Industry's (Haarlem, NL) public vinyl calculator: a seven-step wizard with a live itemised cost list priced on its server. Read its prices for a reference 12" LP at 200 / 300 / 500 / 1,000 copies and for each option worth copying (checked October 2026). Both artist demos (make-a-record and artist-order): - audio arrives as digital files, analog tape (+ tape transfer) or a cut lacquer (no blanks, cutting or mastering; mastering choice disabled with the reason; cutting and mastering stages skipped in the timeline; the passport starts at "Lacquer received") - labels printed, plain white or plain black (credit line; the label artwork drop is disabled for plain labels; the mock-up shows the plain label) - press cleaning before a colour run, on by default, disabled for black - 7" dinked (large centre hole), 7" only, drawn in the mock-up - download card and barcode sticker extras - run-out inscription (A-Z, 0-9, up to 15), scribed along the dead wax in the mock-up and named in the passport - new rates (tape 3,800, cleaning 2,300 per title; plain labels -12 per disc; download card 43, barcode 6 per copy) are estimates with Record Industry's prices as the basis, each listed in the detailed demo - make-a-record investor notes: Record Industry's 9 to 11 week quote after test-pressing approval against the 7 to 9 week CNX quote, and its 2 % reject allowance against 100 % optical inspection Defaults unchanged (37,836 THB per title, 232 per copy at 100, break-even 41, goal 100, 548 kept). Docs: artist-platform.md (choices table, benchmark section: what was taken, what was left out, commercial terms worth deciding); revenue-model.md (second Western data point: 219 THB a copy at 300 ex-works, per-title and per-copy reading against the assumptions, not a re-base); production-timeline.md (its published lead times). |
||
|
grabowski
|
83f1aa94dc |
Make a record: launching a campaign no longer starts the simulation
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 52s
After Launch the campaign page opens at day 0 with Play ready; the artist (or presenter) starts it. The quick "Run the demo campaign" path behaves the same; only the guided tour presses play itself. |
||
|
grabowski
|
e36d7b00a0 |
Fan funding: the price sets the fans needed; limited edition as a switch
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 1m4s
The artist sets only the fan price; the number of fans needed follows from
it: the plant's 100-copy minimum, or the break-even if that is higher. The
goal selector of
|
||
|
grabowski
|
6a62505aa6 |
Fan funding: the artist chooses the campaign goal in fans
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 1m9s
The goal is no longer fixed at the larger of the plant minimum and the break-even; that is now the floor, and the artist sets any goal above it. - make-a-record.html: "Goal: how many fans you need" with number input, slider and chips (Lowest, 150, 200, 300, 500, 1,000); chips below the floor or above the edition cap stay visible but disabled with the reason; the goal also shows as the pre-order amount (fans x fan price); typing below the floor snaps back with a note; the campaign, the outcome and the stage run against the chosen goal; the tour shows the goal being raised to 150 - artist-order.html: goal field in the campaign card, same floor rule - artist-platform.md: the floor rule and that a higher goal is all or nothing as well Defaults unchanged (goal 100 = the plant minimum at 1,200 THB, break-even 41, 548 THB kept a copy). |
||
|
grabowski
|
4b20ca4f48 |
Side length per format: team table with songs a side; palette control
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 47s
Side length "at most" per format is now the table the team supplied (October 2026, from recordplayerexpert.com, songs counted at an average 4:32): 12" 22 / 15 min, 10" 15 / 12 min, 7" 7 / 5 min at 33 1/3 / 45 rpm. Changes against the earlier microcut.studio figures: 10" 33 1/3 16 -> 15, 10" 45 11 -> 12, 7" 45 6 -> 5. The comfortable column stays the lower end of microcut.studio's ranges. - artist-platform.md: table with a songs column, both sources, and the three formats where cutting rooms disagree (10" 45 is now more generous than microcut.studio and Diggers Factory) as re-check points for the cutting engineer - artist-order.html: LIM and the side-length table (songs column, sources) - make-a-record.html: LIM; format cards show the at-most time and about how many songs a side; step 2 hint adds the songs; the last control in each colour row is now a labelled "Palette" pill with a colour wheel, showing the chosen colour and "Your colour" when a custom colour is set |