User, October 2026: the Duplex sketch is not to scale, check it against
the documents; the fire water tank is too small.
Model (changed live in the open FreeCAD 26.3 document):
- both Duplex cells rebuilt in the sketched arrangement at the documented
sizes: presses 0.95 m square (0.9 m2) turned 45 deg, EX 50 0.5 x 1.0 m
(0.5 m2), EX 35 0.4 x 0.8 m and trimmer 0.6 x 0.6 m (estimates),
operator position marked; 0.6 to 0.8 m between machines;
- fire water: the ~25 m3 yard tank replaced by the facility-security
planning tank, 9 m x 4 m (254 m3 gross, ~200 m3 usable), new params
fw_dia, fw_h, fw_x, fw_y, at the front by the access road, outside the
production yard, on a ring foundation, with a pump house (duty electric,
standby diesel, jockey); the yard process water tank is now the 5 x 3 m
raw water tank of the phase 1 RFQ.
Docs: site-candidates (cell, raw water, fire water bullet),
facility-security (the Payap model draws the tank; 6 m racking and twice
the floor area make ~200 m3 a floor there).
New docs/crane-workshop-tours.md: a 5 t single-girder EOT crane over the
whole production compartment (stops at the warehouse fire wall), a
machine door and crane-served workshop/machine bay at the ramp end, and
a glazed ground-level visitor corridor along the car-park elevation with
stations in process order, its own air and acoustic glazing so tours
need no PPE. Covers what each changes in the shell (crane-ready frame,
hook height under the 7.0 m eave, no full-height cross walls in the
crane zone, room lids and crane hatches), safety, costs and open
decisions.
Propagated: construction RFQ (crane-ready frame, new section 1c, machine
door, accessible 1:12 entrance now required), scale zone table (+210 to
280 m2, total ~1,400 to 2,000 m2), facility security, worker safety,
roadmap items 9 and 15, total investment added-scope table, README.
Models the plot and everything on it in FreeCAD, and writes up the
decisions the modelling forced.
Parcel geometry is traced from the DOL LandsMaps cadastral polygon and
reconciled against that portal's own measured edge lengths (40.86 + 26.61
/ 166.81 / 42.48 + 14.94 / 152.46 m), which the trace reproduces to within
about 1% with 1.67 m of closure error over a 444 m perimeter. Note the
mapped extent comes out near 9,570 sqm against a deed area of 8,266 sqm,
a ~16% gap that needs a surveyor before any offer.
On the site: 60x25 m production building on a 10 degree monopitch, a
45x38 m phase-2 building, roof and carport PV, fire and raw water tanks,
a detached boiler/chiller utility yard, perimeter wall and gate, guard
house, roofed staff parking, and the loading and fire-access roads.
Docs:
- scale.md: expansion headroom for a second building, and the detached
utility yard, which frees ~126 sqm inside the main shed
- sustainability.md: roof orientation study (rotating the building for
solar gains under 1 point and costs 4 m of clearance, so it stays
aligned to the plot), and a new water supply section
- facility-security.md: fire water supply behind the existing
suppression design
Figures marked as estimates are planning-grade, not engineering
calculations; the PV module spec is a generic placeholder, and zoning for
factory use on this plot is still unverified.
- docs/facility-layout.drawio: zoned floor concept (production, galvanics,
utilities, logistics, support) with material and stamper flow arrows
- PNG and PDF exports alongside the source
- facility-security.md: suppression subsection no longer splits the fire
safety bullet list; clean agent wording updated to FK-5-1-12
grabowski