PVC lab: instrument list with estimates, and cost it

quality-automation.md: the day-one per-lot tier becomes a table with an
instrument class and a rough price per check (moisture analyzer, strip
oven, density balance, spectrophotometer, gloss, sieves, muffle furnace,
stereo microscope), plus what was missing: a lab plaque press or two-roll
mill so speck, color and DSC tests do not tie up a production press;
sample conditioning as part of the method at 60 to 90 % ambient humidity;
magnets for metal in lots and regrind. Day-one tier ~USD 55k to 150k
(estimate); Karl Fischer and the ISO 182 Thermomat as options. Mature tier
priced (~120k to 240k), handheld XRF as an option, and partner labs (Payap
pharmacy, CMU science) to defer it.

total-investment.md: the day-one tier goes into "Added scope, not yet in
the roll-up" (55k to 150k USD, 1.8M to 5.0M THB); added total now ~290k
to 690k USD, about 7 to 9 % on the subtotal. Headline total unchanged.
This commit is contained in:
grabowski committed 2026-10-03 21:51:00 +02:00
1 parent c56d403da0
commit 9b26cfbf7c
2 files changed
+64 -29

No files matched your search

+60 -27
View File
@@ -205,37 +205,69 @@ the lot ID follows every record pressed from it:
### The PVC lab, in tiers
Prices are rough list-price ranges per instrument class (estimates, not
quotes; ask Thai distributors for local pricing and service).
**Per lot, in-house from day one** (benchtop instruments, all with data
export for the traceability gate):
- Moisture content: halogen moisture analyzer or Karl Fischer titration;
minutes per sample, and the most common cause of noisy surfaces
- Heat stability: oven strips at pressing-relevant temperatures watching
discoloration over time; the formal methods are ISO 182 (Congo red /
conductivity), tracking HCl evolution
- Density: checked against the compound spec; feeds record weight
consistency
- Color: spectrophotometer L\*a\*b\* against the reference, plus gloss for
black compound
- Granulate physicals: sieve analysis for particle size distribution, bulk
density, dust/fines content
- Ash content: muffle furnace burn-off as a filler-loading drift check
- Pressed-plaque inspection for specks, gels, and contamination (shareable
with the optical inspection investment)
| Check | Instrument | Estimate, USD |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture, minutes per sample; the most common cause of noisy surfaces | Halogen moisture analyzer (Mettler HC / Sartorius MA class) | 3k to 8k |
| Heat stability: oven strips at pressing-relevant temperatures, watching discoloration over time | Lab oven with timed strip racks | 3k to 8k |
| Density against the compound spec; feeds record weight consistency | Analytical balance with density kit | 4k to 8k |
| Color L\*a\*b\* against the reference lot | Spectrophotometer | 10k to 30k |
| Gloss on black compound | Gloss meter | 2k to 5k |
| Granulate physicals: particle size distribution, bulk density, dust and fines | Sieve shaker with sieve stack, bulk density cup | 3k to 8k |
| Ash content as a filler-loading drift check | Muffle furnace | 3k to 8k |
| Specks, gels and contamination on pressed plaques | Stereo microscope and light table (the method is shareable with the optical inspection investment) | 3k to 8k |
| Test plaques for the speck count, color and DSC, without tying up a production press | Lab hot plaque press or small two-roll mill | 20k to 60k |
| Sample conditioning (below) | Drying oven, desiccators, sealed retained-sample storage | 2k to 5k |
| Metal contamination in lots and regrind | Grate or bar magnets at the hopper and regrind intake | under 2k |
| **Day-one tier** | | **~55k to 150k** |
**In-house as the lab matures** (the PVC-specific workhorses):
Two optional upgrades to the day-one tier: Karl Fischer titration for low
moisture levels and supplier disputes (10k to 20k), and the formal heat
stability method, ISO 182 Congo red / conductivity tracking of HCl
evolution (Metrohm PVC Thermomat class, 20k to 35k).
- Torque rheometry (Brabender class): fusion/gelation time and torque,
the standard predictor of how a PVC compound behaves in the extruder;
plain melt-flow index is less informative for PVC than for other
thermoplastics because the material is shear- and heat-sensitive
- DSC: glass transition, additive signatures, and the record-relevant
application of measuring the degree of gelation of a pressed record,
which correlates with surface noise and durability, turning DSC into a
process-tuning tool as well as an incoming check
- FTIR: identity fingerprint; record compound is classically a vinyl
chloride/vinyl acetate copolymer rather than pure PVC, and FTIR verifies
the copolymer and catches unannounced formulation changes
**Sample conditioning is part of the method, not an extra.** At 60 to 90 %
ambient humidity granulate picks up moisture between the warehouse and the
balance, so a moisture result is only comparable if the sample was taken
sealed, conditioned the same way every time and tested within a fixed
window. The lab sits in the conditioned QC zone ([scale](scale.md)) at the
HVAC's controlled humidity, and the retained sample of every lot is stored
sealed.
The plaque press makes the inspection plaques; the **release test
pressing** of a new lot still runs on a production press, because that is
the real test.
**In-house as the lab matures** (the PVC-specific workhorses, ~USD 120k to
240k together):
- Torque rheometry (Brabender class, ~60k to 120k): fusion/gelation time
and torque, the standard predictor of how a PVC compound behaves in the
extruder; plain melt-flow index is less informative for PVC than for
other thermoplastics because the material is shear- and heat-sensitive
- DSC (~40k to 80k): glass transition, additive signatures, and the
record-relevant application of measuring the degree of gelation of a
pressed record, which correlates with surface noise and durability,
turning DSC into a process-tuning tool as well as an incoming check
- FTIR with ATR (~20k to 40k): identity fingerprint; record compound is
classically a vinyl chloride/vinyl acetate copolymer rather than pure
PVC, and FTIR verifies the copolymer and catches unannounced formulation
changes and foreign polymers in the regrind
- Option: handheld XRF (~25k to 40k) brings stabilizer and heavy-metal
screening in-house for every lot instead of per supplier, worth it while
Thai and regional compounders are being qualified
**Partner labs before buying the mature tier.** Pharmacy and science
faculties routinely run FTIR, DSC and Karl Fischer; Payap University's
Faculty of Pharmacy ([Payap partnership](payap-partnership.md)) and Chiang
Mai University's science faculties are the obvious places to ask
(unconfirmed which instruments they hold). Contract testing there defers
most of the mature tier until lot volume justifies owning it.
**External lab, per supplier qualification** (not per lot):
@@ -252,7 +284,8 @@ The tiers define the protocol: the per-lot gate runs moisture, heat
stability, color, density, and granulate physicals plus the release test
pressing; a new supplier additionally gets the full external panel and
pressing trials. This is the working method for qualifying Thai and
regional compounds against the European references.
regional compounds against the European references. The day-one tier is
costed in [total investment](finance/total-investment.md) as added scope.
## Packaging QC