Re-base scale, pressing line, roadmap, revenue model and calculator on the launch plant
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 48s
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 48s
Launch plant (user, October 2026): one Duplex system and one Classic, with cutting and galvanics in-house, everything in one capital round. - scale.md: capacity table now launch plant 0.71-0.97M records/yr, the second Duplex as a growth option; launch utilities (450-540 kg/h on B-1/B-2, ~390 kW on 2 x 250 kW); calculator figure ~0.94M. - pressing-line.md: launch plant section on top; five-press fleet kept as the layout fleet the hall and backbone are built for. - roadmap.md: long-lead orders for the launch plant, no bridge stampers or outsourced cutting, commissioning order, what stays revenue-gated. - revenue-model.md: operating picture of the launch plant: central revenue ~3.75M USD, EBITDA ~1.6M, operating profit ~1.1M, payback ~4 yr on 216M THB, break-even ~0.3M records; adverse corner cannot cover depreciation. Five-press table kept and labelled. - fleet-calculator.html: start fleet 1 Duplex + 1 Classic, target 850k, capex base 6.55M (cases 8.9 / 6.55 / 4.9M), Duplex beyond one, chiller 500 kW, imported machinery 2.3M, ladder from the launch plant. - total-investment.md: superseded note updated.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
7344f12dc8
commit
794cde228c
6 files changed
+156
-45
No files matched your search
@@ -575,7 +575,74 @@ base salaries in that way.
|
||||
is likely, but price realisation and cost control each move the margin
|
||||
by more than a third on their own
|
||||
|
||||
## Operating picture at full capacity
|
||||
## Operating picture of the launch plant (October 2026)
|
||||
|
||||
The plant now launches with one Newbilt Duplex system and one Classic,
|
||||
with cutting and galvanics in-house from the start
|
||||
([total investment](total-investment.md#launch-plant-october-2026)). Three
|
||||
presses make ~0.71 to 0.97 million records a year on two shifts
|
||||
([scale](../scale.md#production-capacity)), against 1.0 to 1.5 million for
|
||||
the five-press fleet the full-capacity table below was built for. Same
|
||||
method and the same three cases, with these changes (all estimates):
|
||||
|
||||
- **Volume** 0.71M / 0.84M / 0.97M records a year.
|
||||
- **Direct payroll** stays at 3.7M to 5.4M THB a year (two shifts still
|
||||
need the press, finishing, galvanics, QC and maintenance crews), so
|
||||
labour per record rises to 0.12 / 0.16 / 0.23 USD and the direct cost to
|
||||
1.34 / 1.98 / 2.65 USD.
|
||||
- **Title services**: 200 / 300 / 400 titles at 580 / 1,155 / 1,730 USD,
|
||||
60 to 70 % contribution after lacquers, styli and nickel. The middle
|
||||
price is the per-title fee of the artist demos (37,836 THB).
|
||||
- **Depreciation** on the launch plant: 8.9M USD over 10 years (adverse),
|
||||
the 216M THB target (~6.55M USD) over 12.5 years (central), 4.9M USD
|
||||
over 15 years (favourable).
|
||||
- **Cash overheads** unchanged at 0.20M to 0.45M USD, paired high to
|
||||
adverse.
|
||||
|
||||
| USD/yr | Adverse | Central | Favourable |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Records | 0.71M | 0.84M | 0.97M |
|
||||
| Blended price | 3.50 | 4.05 | 4.60 |
|
||||
| Direct cost | 2.65 | 1.98 | 1.34 |
|
||||
| Contribution per record | 0.85 | 2.07 | 3.26 |
|
||||
| Pressing contribution | 0.60M | 1.74M | 3.17M |
|
||||
| Title-services contribution | 0.07M | 0.23M | 0.48M |
|
||||
| **Total contribution** | **0.67M** | **1.96M** | **3.65M** |
|
||||
| Cash overheads | 0.45M | 0.33M | 0.20M |
|
||||
| **EBITDA** | **0.22M** | **1.63M** | **3.45M** |
|
||||
| Depreciation | 0.89M | 0.52M | 0.33M |
|
||||
| **Operating profit** | **-0.67M** | **1.11M** | **3.12M** |
|
||||
| Revenue | 2.60M (~86M THB) | 3.75M (~124M THB) | 5.15M (~170M THB) |
|
||||
| Payback on the launch capital (EBITDA, mature year) | never | ~4 yr (3.0 to 5.5 on 4.9M to 8.9M) | ~1.4 yr |
|
||||
|
||||
What it says:
|
||||
|
||||
- **The central case works on 216M THB**: EBITDA ~1.6M USD (~54M THB) a
|
||||
year and operating profit ~1.1M USD (~37M THB) once the plant runs at
|
||||
volume, and it breaks even on operating profit at about **0.3 million
|
||||
records a year, a little over a third of capacity**.
|
||||
- **The adverse corner cannot pay for itself at any volume the three
|
||||
presses make**: it would need ~1.5 million records to cover
|
||||
depreciation. It stacks the low price, the high cost, the high capital
|
||||
and the high overheads at once; at the central cost and volume the
|
||||
price that covers depreciation is only ~2.7 to 3.0 USD (~90 to 98 THB)
|
||||
a record, below the low price assumed.
|
||||
- **The caveats of the full-capacity table hold here too**: the central
|
||||
EBITDA margin (~43 %) is far above the 15 to 25 % pressing plants earn,
|
||||
because the direct cost table leaves out indirect labour, freight,
|
||||
scrap above the allowance and commissions. Price realisation and
|
||||
utilisation decide the result, and the ramp year is not in this table
|
||||
(the ramp-up reserve in the investment covers it).
|
||||
- Not modelled: cassette and CD-R lines, stamper supply to other
|
||||
pressing plants, dropshipping fees. The solar PPA lever in the
|
||||
investment would add its power price to the energy line instead of
|
||||
capital.
|
||||
|
||||
## Operating picture at full capacity (five-press fleet)
|
||||
|
||||
The fleet this table describes (two Duplex systems and a Classic) is now
|
||||
a growth option; the launch plant is in the section above.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Built from the components above rather than asserted. The
|
||||
[press fleet calculator](../fleet-calculator.html) runs the same P&L for
|
||||
@@ -588,7 +655,7 @@ and nickel; a lacquer blank costs about **70 EUR** (team figure, October
|
||||
2026), one per side, so ~160 USD a two-sided title before recuts. Cash overheads (admin, sales, insurance, facility running,
|
||||
IT, professional fees, marketing) are estimated at **200–450k USD/yr**
|
||||
and deliberately paired high-to-adverse. Depreciation is the 4.7–8.9M
|
||||
capex over 10–15 years.
|
||||
capex of the earlier full vision over 10–15 years.
|
||||
|
||||
| USD/yr | Adverse | Central | Favourable |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -129,8 +129,10 @@ target with the levers above, and 180M as the low-quote case.
|
||||
## Full vision, all blocks (July 2026, superseded)
|
||||
|
||||
The five-press full vision below is superseded by the launch plant above.
|
||||
It stays until the documents that quote its 4.7M to 8.9M USD total (README,
|
||||
roadmap, revenue model, business plan) are re-based on the launch plant.
|
||||
Scale, pressing line, roadmap, revenue model (which now has a launch-plant
|
||||
operating picture) and the fleet calculator are re-based on the launch
|
||||
plant; the business plan is next. It stays for the record of how the
|
||||
blocks were built.
|
||||
|
||||
| Block | USD | THB | Basis |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user