Skin resistance is a small fraction of real AC impedance (proximity
and inductance dominate), so AC must not appear in the descriptions.
README headline, PCM/plugin metadata, pyproject, dialog note, CLI
help and the summary label now all say: skin-only lower bound on the
resistance rise, not an AC impedance simulation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- pyproject.toml + uv.lock: uv-managed dev environment (uv sync /
uv run pytest). requirements.txt stays: KiCad builds the plugin's
runtime venv from it and the PCM zip packages it.
- README: em-dash and run-on cleanup (34 -> 22, the rest deliberate),
split the 120-word THT solder-joint sentence, fix the documented
ADAPTIVE_MAX_CELL_UM value (2 mm -> 1 mm, config has 1000 um), fix
the *Packaging / publishing* cross-reference, dev sections now use
uv sync / uv run.
- LLM disclaimer: "most commits" carry the trailer (32 of 39), figures
claim now excepts the hand-drawn hole cross-section, reference the
UT3513+ measured-vs-computed validation.
- .gitignore: local AI-tooling artifacts; deploy scripts exclude
pyproject.toml/uv.lock; error-figure title punctuation aligned with
the other window titles.
janik
grabowski