Own catalogue: sales map, demand model and market advisor (plan)

New docs/catalogue-intelligence.md for Alexander's idea of a catalogue
the plant presses for itself. Why (idle Classic hours ~60k to 160k
records a year at 60 % specials on the doc basis; two-week represses
from the metal archive; Thai catalogue sells in Japan, EM Records,
ZudRangMa), scope (Poy Records as seed; customers' data and press dates
protected), data sources with access terms (Bandcamp ship-to fields,
distributor sell-through clauses, opt-in record passport registrations,
Spotify for Artists, Discogs CC0 dumps; Discogs API marketplace and
want data restricted), ERPNext touchpoints (Licence, Channel Sales
Report, Catalogue Recommendation, geocoded addresses, CRM), PDPA rules
for the map, dashboard views on an open-source map stack, a staged
demand model with a stocking rule for run size, a propose-only advisor
on an open-weights model, phasing, cost estimates, risks and open
decisions.

Backlinks: README (planning documents, layout), roadmap item 28,
digital-factory tool rule, artist-platform repress pre-orders,
production-timeline repress, revenue-model ResurRec Japan.

docs/finance/revenue-model.md

@@ -594,7 +594,9 @@ For CNX it means the ~0.74M records a year the plan needs from Asian
 labels ([roadmap](../roadmap.md) item 1) has to come more from Southeast
 Asia, the rest of Asia and Western export, where the plants above
 compete, and less from Japan's queue. That makes the buyer conversations
-in item 1 more pressing, not less.
+in item 1 more pressing, not less. Selling Thai catalogue into Japan is a
+different route that does not compete with ResurRec's presses there
+([own catalogue](../catalogue-intelligence.md)).
 
 Open questions: where the Japan plant is, since when, how many presses
 and which, whether it plates, whether Bangkok keeps its orders or