Record the Making Vinyl feedback on traceability
Most people the team talked to in Haarlem were strongly interested in the full-traceability approach. For Sibert it was one of the reasons to talk to us at all; without it their representative would strongly advise against the plan, and seeing buildfor.life's development and data work convinced him the project comes from the right direction. Exhibitor briefing gets an "After the show" section (feedback, what has been filed since); traceability.md opens with the market signal; roadmap item 1 notes it as supply-side evidence, with buyer prices still missing; README project status updated (show attended, Payap lead).
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
ffbc46782a
commit
c56d403da0
4 files changed
+41
-5
No files matched your search
+5
-1
@@ -17,7 +17,11 @@ These three run in parallel and gate everything downstream:
|
||||
recorded in the revenue model. The prices disagree with the model on
|
||||
per-title services and run size; the tour showed no plating and no
|
||||
HVAC anywhere in the incumbent's operation, which is the strongest
|
||||
argument yet for pulling galvanics forward from Phase 5. Carry the
|
||||
argument yet for pulling galvanics forward from Phase 5. Making Vinyl
|
||||
Europe 2026 added supply-side evidence (strong interest in the
|
||||
traceability approach, see the
|
||||
[exhibitor briefing](suppliers/making-vinyl-europe-2026-exhibitors.md#after-the-show)),
|
||||
but no buyer prices yet. Carry the
|
||||
open run-size question into these conversations. The
|
||||
[artist platform](artist-platform.md)'s price calculator, published
|
||||
early with indicative prices and an interest list but no payments,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user