Payap still an option: rezoning route; order example opaque
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 2m40s
Deploy test site / deploy (push) Successful in 2m40s
User, 20 Oct 2026: Payap University claims they can rezone the land; update the deck to show it is still an option. And: do not use a transparent vinyl as the example in the order tool screenshot. - land-listings/payap/rezoning-2026-10-20.md (new): what a rezoning is under the Town Planning Act B.E. 2562 (section 35 amendment started by DPT or the local official, Town Planning Commission, 30-day posting with objections, Ministry of Interior notification via Cabinet and the Royal Gazette; a landowner can ask, not rezone), the DPT's own work plan (~70 weeks without objections, ~82 with: ~16 to 19 months), the schedule effect (roughly a year on first production unless the request starts now; estimate) and what to ask Payap. DPT procedure PDF filed. - site-candidates.md: Payap "still an option" in the table, rezoning paragraph with an Open action, check 1 and the re-siting rule; zoning record, payap-partnership.md and README point to it. - Business plan 6.1, risk table and critical path: Payap's rezoning claim and its ~16 to 19 months; A and B rebuilt (63 pages, checked). - Deck: site slide names Payap as an option once rezoned, notes and source line; risk row updated. - order.html: the "Splatter 12"" preset now has a white base instead of clear; deck platform screenshots re-shot in both themes (numbers unchanged: 100 fans, break-even 46, ~480 THB kept). Order checks 96/96, fan parity 206/206; deck verify clean in both themes, PDFs rebuilt.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
744a56d22b
commit
967e6b1c76
20 files changed
+171
-17
No files matched your search
Binary file not shown.
@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ The DPT site states that its data is preliminary information and not a legal
|
||||
reference; the provincial public works and town planning office confirms.
|
||||
A point query does not show the parcel boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
**Update 20 October 2026:** Payap says the land can be rezoned; what a
|
||||
rezoning takes and how long: [rezoning-2026-10-20.md](rezoning-2026-10-20.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Result
|
||||
|
||||
- **Plan:** ผังเมืองรวมเมืองเชียงใหม่ (Chiang Mai comprehensive city plan), in
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
|
||||
# Payap: rezoning, what it takes (checked 20 October 2026)
|
||||
|
||||
Payap University told the project on 20 October 2026 that the land can be
|
||||
rezoned. The point it first gave lies in zone ย.7-1, very high density
|
||||
residential, of the Chiang Mai comprehensive city plan in force from 25 May
|
||||
2026, where a record-pressing factory cannot be licensed
|
||||
([zoning record](dpt-zoning-2026-10-14.md)). This note records what a
|
||||
rezoning is under Thai law and how long the planning department itself
|
||||
schedules it, so the claim can be weighed. It is our reading of the sources
|
||||
below, not legal advice; Thai counsel and the Chiang Mai Provincial Office of
|
||||
Public Works and Town and Country Planning confirm.
|
||||
|
||||
## The legal route
|
||||
|
||||
- The Chiang Mai city plan is a **Notification of the Ministry of Interior**
|
||||
under the **Town Planning Act B.E. 2562 (2019)** (Royal Gazette, vol. 143,
|
||||
special part 130 ง, 25 May 2026; the earlier plan was a ministerial
|
||||
regulation of 2012, amended 2017).
|
||||
- A landowner's own application to change the plan's rules (sections 30 and
|
||||
31) belongs to the 90-day posting of a plan before it is issued. That
|
||||
window closed before the plan came into force.
|
||||
- After that, a plan is changed for a particular area under **section 35**:
|
||||
the Department of Public Works and Town and Country Planning (DPT) or the
|
||||
local official amends it "in order to be suited to changing circumstances
|
||||
and environment or for public interests" and submits it to the Town
|
||||
Planning Commission (or the provincial committee); once approved it is
|
||||
posted for at least 30 days, interested persons may object in writing, the
|
||||
objections are decided as under section 31, and the amendment is issued
|
||||
as a new Ministry of Interior notification, which goes to the Cabinet
|
||||
first and is then published in the Royal Gazette.
|
||||
- So a rezoning is not in the landowner's hands. Payap can ask, and support
|
||||
the request with a public-interest case (a university-industry training
|
||||
plant, jobs); the DPT decides whether to start it, the Town Planning
|
||||
Commission whether to approve it, and neighbours can object.
|
||||
|
||||
Source: Town Planning Act B.E. 2562 (2019), sections 29 to 35, English
|
||||
translation by the Office of the Council of State (no legal force; the Thai
|
||||
text governs), via UNEP LEAP:
|
||||
<https://leap.unep.org/sites/default/files/legislation/THA/Town%2520Planning%2520Ac.pdf>;
|
||||
the plan in force: <https://ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/documents/116050.pdf>
|
||||
(both checked 20 October 2026).
|
||||
|
||||
## How long the DPT schedules it
|
||||
|
||||
The DPT's own work plan for a section 35 amendment of a plan it prepares
|
||||
(the Chiang Mai city plan is one), as published with the procedure
|
||||
"ขั้นตอนและกระบวนการแก้ไขผังเมืองรวม ตามพระราชบัญญัติการผังเมือง พ.ศ. 2562"
|
||||
(filed here as
|
||||
[DPT_city-plan-amendment-procedure-s35.pdf](DPT_city-plan-amendment-procedure-s35.pdf);
|
||||
copy hosted by Hua Sai municipality,
|
||||
<https://www.huasai.go.th/news/doc_download/a_291124_112924.pdf>, checked
|
||||
20 October 2026):
|
||||
|
||||
| Step | What happens | Weeks (DPT plan) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1 | Provincial office gathers the issue, reasons and facts; DPT review | ~7 |
|
||||
| 2 | Comprehensive plan advisory committee | ~4 |
|
||||
| 3 | DPT town planning review committee | ~3 |
|
||||
| 4 | Town Planning Commission (sub-committee, then the commission) | ~8 |
|
||||
| 5 | Preparing and posting the amendment for 30 days | 15 |
|
||||
| 6 | Objections: collected and decided | ~2 if none, ~14 if any |
|
||||
| 7 | Drafting the Ministry of Interior notification | ~10 |
|
||||
| 8 | Ministry law committee, Cabinet approval, Royal Gazette | ~21 |
|
||||
| | **Total** | **~70 weeks (~16 months) without objections, ~82 weeks (~19 months) with** |
|
||||
|
||||
These are the department's planning durations, not a promise; a
|
||||
contested change in a residential zone, or one that waits for a committee
|
||||
date, takes longer.
|
||||
|
||||
## What it would mean for the plant (our reading, estimates)
|
||||
|
||||
- The amendment must let the plot carry factory type 107 (the type whose
|
||||
definition names gramophone records), plastics extrusion, a steam boiler
|
||||
and electroplating. The same plan permits type 107 in its low density
|
||||
residential, special industrial, agricultural land reform and rural and
|
||||
agricultural zones, so the likely request is a move of the plot into one
|
||||
of those, not a change of ย.7-1's rules for the whole zone.
|
||||
- Neither the building permit nor the factory licence (Ror.Ngor.4) can rest
|
||||
on the amendment until it is in force. On the August 2026 calendar
|
||||
([project timeline](../../project-timeline.md)) design and permits start
|
||||
around March 2027 and first production is ~Q4 2028; an amendment begun in
|
||||
early 2027 would be gazetted around mid-2028 at the earliest, so a
|
||||
rezoned Payap plot moves first production by roughly a year unless the
|
||||
request starts now and design runs at risk in parallel.
|
||||
- The plan has been in force only since May 2026, after a full revision;
|
||||
the public-interest case has to explain why this area should change so
|
||||
soon.
|
||||
|
||||
## What to ask Payap for
|
||||
|
||||
1. Which plot, with the title deed number and a map: the first point or
|
||||
other land.
|
||||
2. What it has done or will do: a request to the Chiang Mai provincial
|
||||
office? Which zone it would ask for, and the office's response in
|
||||
writing.
|
||||
3. Its timetable for the request, and whether the university council
|
||||
supports a commercial lease on the rezoned land.
|
||||
4. Whether the pharmaceutical facility under construction went through the
|
||||
same route, and with which result.
|
||||
|
||||
Until a written answer from the provincial office exists, the rezoning is
|
||||
Payap's statement, not a planning fact.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user